From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zcars04e.nortelnetworks.com (zcars04e.nortelnetworks.com [47.129.242.56]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8666267B3D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:56:18 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4254771B.2070802@nortel.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 17:56:11 -0600 From: Chris Friesen MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt References: <425429BF.1050706@nortel.com> <1112829596.9518.210.camel@gaston> <42547112.9000302@nortel.com> <1112831363.9518.215.camel@gaston> In-Reply-To: <1112831363.9518.215.camel@gaston> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev list Subject: Re: question on inline assembly and long long values List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > But the kernel code always runs in 64 bits mode... The ppc kernel (not ppc64) runs in 64-bit mode? An unsigned long long fits in a single register in C code? Yeah, the optimisations really don't matter much...the ugly resulting code just bothered me. Chris