From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
To: Chris_Poblete@Dell.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sdake@mvista.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to ipmi_poweroff module
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:14:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4256ADFC.7070906@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D69989B48C25DB489BBB0207D0BF51F70262F423@ausx2kmpc104.aus.amer.dell.com>
Chris_Poblete@Dell.com wrote:
>The message handler and si are already using /proc/ipmi/<intf_num>. The
>patch code simply reuse it. By the way, shouldn't we be using sysfs?
>
>
Yes, we should. There's not much sysfs support in the ipmi driver yet;
a patch to add class stuff is in the mm kernels, but nothing for the
device stuff.
>As for separating from power_off, it just seem so simple to integrate
>the power cycle command into the power_off code. It could definitely be
>a separate module.
>
>
It's probably ok to leave it like it is for now. I really wasn't
talking about separating, I was talking about what user operation causes
the power cycle. It would be nice if you could tie this to reset
instead of poweroff, but that's not a huge deal. It would take a while
to get that infrastructure into the kernel.
-Corey
>Thanks,
>-Chris Poblete
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Corey Minyard [mailto:cminyard@mvista.com]
>Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 10:35 AM
>To: Poblete, Chris
>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; sdake@mvista.com
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to ipmi_poweroff module
>
>Chris_Poblete@Dell.com wrote:
>
>
>
>>Below is a patch to add "power cycle" functionality to the IPMI power
>>off module ipmi_poweroff.
>>
>>A new module param is added to support this:
>>parmtype: do_power_cycle:int
>>parm: do_power_cycle: Set to 1 to enable power cycle instead
>>of power down. Power cycle is contingent on hardware support, otherwise
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>it defaults back to power down.
>>
>>This parameter can also be dynamically modified through the proc
>>filesystem:
>>/proc/ipmi/<interface_num>/poweroff
>>
>>
>>
>>
>This should probably be /proc/sys/dev/ipmi/power_cycle_on_halt. Most
>things to control a system go there. The /proc/sys/dev/ipmi directory
>should probably be created by the base IPMI file, too.
>
>Thinking about it a little more, this should really be an option for
>reset, not for power off (thus making the name power_cycle_on_reset).
>I'm not sure how easy that will be to tie into. It doesn't look easy;
>there's not something like pm_power_off for reset.
>
>All the proc fs stuff should be ifdef-ed appropriately so it will
>compile with procfs turned off.
>
>-Corey
>
>
>
>>The power cycle action is considered an optional chassis control in the
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>IPMI specification. However, it is definitely useful when the hardware
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>supports it. A power cycle is usually required in order to reset a
>>firmware in a bad state. This action is critical to allow remote
>>management of servers.
>>
>>The implementation adds power cycle as optional to the ipmi_poweroff
>>module. It can be modified dynamically through the proc entry mentioned
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>above. During a power down and enabled, the power cycle command is sent
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>to the BMC firmware. If it fails either due to non-support or some
>>error, it will retry to send the command as power off.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Christopher A. Poblete <Chris_Poblete@dell.com>
>>
>>--
>>Chris Poblete
>>Software Engineer
>>Dell OpenManage Instrumentation
>>
>>
>>===== drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.c linux-2.6.11.6 vi edited =====
>>--- linux-2.6.11.6/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.c.orig
>>2005-03-25 21:28:22.000000000 -0600
>>+++ linux-2.6.11.6/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.c 2005-04-07
>>18:36:10.656537656 -0500
>>@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
>>#include <asm/semaphore.h>
>>#include <linux/kdev_t.h>
>>#include <linux/module.h>
>>+#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>>+#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
>>#include <linux/string.h>
>>#include <linux/ipmi.h>
>>#include <linux/ipmi_smi.h>
>>@@ -41,6 +43,13 @@
>>#define PFX "IPMI poweroff: "
>>#define IPMI_POWEROFF_VERSION "v33"
>>
>>+/* container to flag power cycle instead of power down */ static int
>>+do_power_cycle = 0;
>>+
>>+/* parameter definition to allow user to flag power cycle */
>>+module_param(do_power_cycle, int, 0); MODULE_PARM_DESC(do_power_cycle,
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>+" Set to 1 to enable power cycle
>>instead of power down. Power cycle is contingent on hardware support,
>>otherwise it defaults back to power down.");
>>+
>>/* Where to we insert our poweroff function? */ extern void
>>(*pm_power_off)(void);
>>
>>@@ -349,23 +358,37 @@ static void ipmi_poweroff_chassis (ipmi_
>> smi_addr.channel = IPMI_BMC_CHANNEL;
>> smi_addr.lun = 0;
>>
>>- printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Powering down via IPMI chassis control
>>command\n");
>>+ powercyclefailed:
>>+ printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Powering %s via IPMI chassis control
>>command\n",
>>+ ((do_power_cycle != 1) ? "down" : "cycle"));
>>
>> /*
>> * Power down
>> */
>> send_msg.netfn = IPMI_NETFN_CHASSIS_REQUEST;
>> send_msg.cmd = IPMI_CHASSIS_CONTROL_CMD;
>>- data[0] = 0; /* Power down */
>>+ if (do_power_cycle != 1) {
>>+ data[0] = 0; /* Power down */
>>+ } else {
>>+ data[0] = 2; /* Power cycle */
>>+ }
>> send_msg.data = data;
>> send_msg.data_len = sizeof(data);
>> rv = ipmi_request_in_rc_mode(user,
>> (struct ipmi_addr *) &smi_addr,
>> &send_msg);
>> if (rv) {
>>- printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Unable to send chassis powerdown
>>message,"
>>- " IPMI error 0x%x\n", rv);
>>- goto out;
>>+ if (do_power_cycle != 1) {
>>+ printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Unable to send chassis
>>power " \
>>+ "down message, IPMI error 0x%x\n", rv);
>>+ goto out;
>>+ } else {
>>+ /* power cycle failed, default to power down */
>>+ printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Unable to send chassis
>>power " \
>>+ "cycle message, IPMI error 0x%x\n", rv);
>>+ do_power_cycle = 0;
>>+ goto powercyclefailed;
>>+ }
>> }
>>
>> out:
>>@@ -418,6 +441,110 @@ static void ipmi_poweroff_function (void
>> ipmi_user_set_run_to_completion(ipmi_user, 0); }
>>
>>+/* procfs global memory */
>>+static struct proc_dir_entry *proc_ipo_root = NULL; static struct
>>+proc_dir_entry *proc_ipo_dir = NULL; static char ipo_dirname[4];
>>+
>>+/* displays properties to proc */
>>+static int proc_read_do_power_cycle(char *page, char **start,
>>+ off_t off, int count,
>>+ int *eof, void *data)
>>+{
>>+ /* sanity check */
>>+ if (data != NULL) {
>>+ return sprintf(page, "do_power_cycle = '%s'\n",
>>+ (*((int *)data) != 0 ? "enabled" : "disabled"));
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ return -EINVAL;
>>+}
>>+
>>+/* process property writes from proc */ static int
>>+proc_write_do_power_cycle(struct file *file,
>>+ const char *buffer,
>>+ unsigned long count,
>>+ void *data)
>>+{
>>+ int rv = count;
>>+ int newval = 0;
>>+
>>+ /* sanity check */
>>+ if ((buffer != NULL) && (data != NULL)) {
>>+ sscanf(buffer, "%d", &newval);
>>+ if (newval != 0) {
>>+ *((int *)data) = 1;
>>+ printk(KERN_INFO PFX "power cycle is now
>>enabled\n");
>>+ } else {
>>+ *((int *)data) = 0;
>>+ printk(KERN_INFO PFX "power cycle is now
>>disabled\n");
>>+ }
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ return rv;
>>+}
>>+
>>+/* removes proc entries */
>>+static void ipmi_po_remove_proc_entries(void) {
>>+ remove_proc_entry("poweroff", proc_ipo_dir);
>>+ if (ipo_dirname[0] != '\0') {
>>+ remove_proc_entry(ipo_dirname, proc_ipo_root);
>>+ ipo_dirname[0] = '\0';
>>+ }
>>+ remove_proc_entry("ipmi", NULL);
>>+}
>>+
>>+/* creates proc entries */
>>+static int ipmi_po_add_proc_entries(int if_num) {
>>+ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_ipo_pc = NULL;
>>+ int rv = -ENOMEM;
>>+
>>+ /* check for unreasonable value, besides buffer has room for
>>only 3 */
>>+ if ((if_num < 0) || (if_num > 255)) {
>>+ printk(KERN_ERR PFX "invalid interface num: %d\n",
>>if_num);
>>+ goto error1;
>>+ }
>>+ proc_ipo_root = proc_mkdir("ipmi", NULL);
>>+ if (!proc_ipo_root) {
>>+ printk(KERN_ERR PFX "failed to create ipmi proc dir\n");
>>+ goto error1;
>>+ }
>>+ proc_ipo_root->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>+ ipo_dirname[0] = '\0';
>>+ sprintf(ipo_dirname, "%d", if_num);
>>+ if (ipo_dirname[0] == '\0') {
>>+ goto error2;
>>+ }
>>+ proc_ipo_dir = proc_mkdir(ipo_dirname, proc_ipo_root);
>>+ if (!proc_ipo_dir) {
>>+ printk(KERN_ERR PFX "failed to create ipmi/%d proc
>>dir\n", if_num);
>>+ goto error2;
>>+ }
>>+ proc_ipo_dir->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>+ proc_ipo_pc = create_proc_entry("poweroff", 0, proc_ipo_dir);
>>+ if (!proc_ipo_pc) {
>>+ printk(KERN_ERR PFX "failed to create poweroff proc
>>entry\n");
>>+ goto error3;
>>+ }
>>+ proc_ipo_pc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>+ proc_ipo_pc->data = &do_power_cycle;
>>+ proc_ipo_pc->read_proc = proc_read_do_power_cycle;
>>+ proc_ipo_pc->write_proc = proc_write_do_power_cycle;
>>+
>>+ /* success only at this point */
>>+ return 0;
>>+
>>+ error3:
>>+ remove_proc_entry(ipo_dirname, proc_ipo_root);
>>+ error2:
>>+ ipo_dirname[0] = '\0';
>>+ remove_proc_entry("ipmi", NULL);
>>+ error1:
>>+ return rv;
>>+}
>>+
>>/* Wait for an IPMI interface to be installed, the first one installed
>> will be grabbed by this code and used to perform the powerdown. */
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>static void ipmi_po_new_smi(int if_num) @@ -430,6 +557,13 @@ static
>>void ipmi_po_new_smi(int if_num)
>> if (ready)
>> return;
>>
>>+ /* add procfs entries for setting properties */
>>+ rv = ipmi_po_add_proc_entries(if_num);
>>+ if (rv) {
>>+ printk(KERN_ERR PFX "failed to create procfs
>>entries\n");
>>+ return;
>>+ }
>>+
>> rv = ipmi_create_user(if_num, &ipmi_poweroff_handler, NULL,
>>&ipmi_user);
>> if (rv) {
>> printk(KERN_ERR PFX "could not create IPMI user, error
>>
>>
>%d\n", @@
>
>
>>-520,6 +654,10 @@ static int ipmi_poweroff_init (void)
>> " IPMI Powerdown via sys_reboot version "
>> IPMI_POWEROFF_VERSION ".\n");
>>
>>+ if (do_power_cycle == 1) {
>>+ printk (KERN_INFO PFX "Power cycle is enabled.\n");
>>+ }
>>+
>> rv = ipmi_smi_watcher_register(&smi_watcher);
>> if (rv)
>> printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Unable to register SMI watcher:
>>%d\n", rv);
>>@@ -532,6 +670,7 @@ static __exit void ipmi_poweroff_cleanup {
>> int rv;
>>
>>+ ipmi_po_remove_proc_entries();
>> ipmi_smi_watcher_unregister(&smi_watcher);
>>
>> if (ready) {
>>
>>
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-08 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-08 15:53 [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to ipmi_poweroff module Chris_Poblete
2005-04-08 16:14 ` Corey Minyard [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-08 16:11 Shawn Starr
2005-04-08 14:54 Chris_Poblete
2005-04-08 15:35 ` Corey Minyard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4256ADFC.7070906@mvista.com \
--to=cminyard@mvista.com \
--cc=Chris_Poblete@Dell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdake@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.