From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: seberino@spawar.navy.mil
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: not sure ESTABLISHED TCP traffic will have ACK flag setalways...
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 00:09:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4258B523.9070902@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050410032308.GA20000@spawar.navy.mil>
> Grant
>
> Wow! Thanks again. You cleared up the last missing piece about ACKs!
> So the slow side can ACK multiple sequence numbers with a single
> packet. Likewise, the /fast/ side can send multiple ACKs for
> the same repetitive sequence number. That makes perfect sense.
>
> Now I believe that TCP packets can all have ACKs set on an
> ESTABLISHED connection.
>
> Chris
>
> P.S. BTW, I'm curious how you knew this level of great info. Did you
> carefully read through RFC 793? That was jam packed with info but
> hard to digest fully.
No, I cant say as I recall reading RFC 793 in particular, though I do read a LOT of RFC pertaining to what I do, I'm a systems administrator / consultant, so I need to know a lot about email (SMTP), DNS, www (HTTP), etc. I spend a lot of time helping others get their system up to speck thus I've run across a lot of not quite up to spec but close enough to work *most* of the time. I get called when it does not. If ever I run across things that I don't know about (and it happens more than you might think) I turn to RFC, Google (this is a REALLY BIG ONE), and peers in the industry on mail lists like this one. It's not what you know, it's who you know to ask. :)
Grant. . . .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-10 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-08 15:57 not sure ESTABLISHED TCP traffic will have ACK flag set always Christian Seberino
2005-04-08 19:59 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-04-08 20:52 ` Michele Vetturi
2005-04-08 21:01 ` not sure ESTABLISHED TCP traffic will have ACK flag setalways Taylor, Grant
2005-04-09 6:24 ` seberino
2005-04-09 18:33 ` Grant Taylor
2005-04-10 3:23 ` seberino
2005-04-10 5:09 ` Grant Taylor [this message]
2005-04-10 3:54 ` seberino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4258B523.9070902@riverviewtech.net \
--to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=seberino@spawar.navy.mil \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.