From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Linuxhippy <linuxhippy@web.de>
Subject: Re: one idea about reiser4 compress
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:10:05 +0200
Message-ID: <4259881D.6010403@web.de>
References: <42553064.9060604@namesys.com> <200504101338.AA00075@bbb-jz5c7z9hn9y.digitalinfra.co.jp> <425940FC.8060401@web.de> <42596187.5000205@slaphack.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-23835-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <42596187.5000205@slaphack.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Hi again ;-)

>>Conclusion: It would be a major hassle to implement such stuff for next
>>to null advantages. There are so many (important) features waiting to be
>>implemented ;-)
>>    
>>
>
>I agree there, but I won't be the one implementing it, and chances are
>you won't either.
>  
>
Wow - a friend - nice ;-)
Well, if we both wont implement anything - we could let Jun implement 
the install-to-compressed-fs feature, right?

lg Clemens