From: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:59:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <425D17B0.8070109@domdv.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1DLgWi-0003Ag-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> What's wrong with using swap over dmcrypt + initramfs? People have
> already used that to do encrypted swsusp.
Nothing. The problem is the fact that after resume there is then
unencrypted(*) data on disk that should never have been there, e.g.
dm-crypt keys, ssh keys, ...
This may lead to nasty surprises that can occur after weeks or months.
(*) unencrypted from the point of view of the running system.
--
Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use robotrap@domdv.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-13 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-10 23:19 [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 10:25 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 10:36 ` folkert
2005-04-11 11:01 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 11:38 ` folkert
2005-04-11 16:28 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 16:36 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 13:08 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 11:08 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 13:11 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 16:11 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-11 21:08 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-12 10:07 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-12 10:52 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-12 13:17 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-13 11:59 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-13 12:59 ` Andreas Steinmetz [this message]
2005-04-13 21:27 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-13 22:29 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-13 23:10 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-13 23:24 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-13 23:39 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-13 23:46 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14 0:35 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14 6:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14 8:08 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-14 9:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-14 17:11 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14 19:27 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-04-14 19:53 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14 20:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14 22:27 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14 22:11 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-04-14 22:48 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-15 9:44 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-15 9:44 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-15 17:00 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14 20:13 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14 9:05 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-15 9:44 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-15 9:47 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14 1:13 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-04-14 8:27 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14 8:31 ` encrypted swap (was Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality) Andy Isaacson
2005-04-14 8:38 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-14 8:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-04-14 1:11 ` [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality Bernd Eckenfels
2005-04-13 13:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-13 14:45 ` Andreas Steinmetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=425D17B0.8070109@domdv.de \
--to=ast@domdv.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.