From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Taylor Grant Subject: Re: Cleanest way to deal with loopback interface? Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:32:56 -0500 Message-ID: <425DC848.5090909@riverviewtech.net> References: <1113425449.3544.177.camel@seberino.spawar.navy.mil> <20050413211349.GA31336@bender.817west.com> <1113436673.3544.186.camel@seberino.spawar.navy.mil> <20050414013525.GA32192@bender.817west.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050414013525.GA32192@bender.817west.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Jason Opperisano Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org > yeah--somewhere around line 1434 of: > > /usr/src/linux-2.4.28/net/ipv4/route.c > > on the machine i'm looking at. Do you have any idea where the corresponding code would be in the 2.6 kernel? I was not aware that such a filter did exist. Personally I'd like a way to turn it off and set up my firewall the way that I want. IMHO this could be considered a hidden bug. Grant. . . .