From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
hadi@cyberus.ca, netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
Tarhon-Onu Victor <mituc@iasi.rdsnet.ro>,
kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, devik@cdi.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: ACPI/HT or Packet Scheduler BUG?
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 19:46:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4262A0E8.9020905@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050416111236.GA31550@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 01:06:39PM +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
>
>>qdisc_destroy can still be invoked without qdisc_tree_lock via the
>>deletion of a class when it calls qdisc_destroy to destroy its
>>leaf qdisc.
>
> Indeed. Fortuantely HTB seems to be safe as it calls sch_tree_lock
> which is another name for qdisc_tree_lock. CBQ on the other hand
> needs to have a little tweak.
HTB also needs to be fixed. Destruction is usually defered by the
refcnt until ->put(), htb_put() doesn't lock the tree. Same for
HFSC and CBQ.
Regards
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-17 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-08 10:13 ACPI/HT or Packet Scheduler BUG? Tarhon-Onu Victor
2005-04-12 12:46 ` Tarhon-Onu Victor
2005-04-14 15:46 ` Tarhon-Onu Victor
2005-04-15 21:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-15 21:44 ` jamal
2005-04-15 21:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-15 22:54 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-16 1:49 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-16 5:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-16 11:06 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-16 11:12 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-17 17:46 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-04-17 21:37 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-16 11:23 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-16 11:34 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-16 16:04 ` jamal
2005-04-16 18:21 ` Thomas Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4262A0E8.9020905@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devik@cdi.cz \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mituc@iasi.rdsnet.ro \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.