From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH NF_CONNTRACK 0/8]: conflict symbols and getorigdst issue/bugs Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 23:49:30 +0200 Message-ID: <4262D9EA.8010702@trash.net> References: <200503221323.j2MDNfXS028596@toshiba.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI In-Reply-To: <200503221323.j2MDNfXS028596@toshiba.co.jp> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Hi Yasuyuki, Yasuyuki KOZAKAI wrote: > These are patches for nf_conntrack which > - unify common enums/flags in ip_conntrack and nf_conntrack, > as we talked, > - fix other conflicts by changing he name of them in nf_conntrack, > - change SO_ORIGINAL_DST to IPV6_ORIGINAL_DST in netfilter_ipv6.h > SO_* are socket level option names, not IP level. This doesn't > change netfilter_ipv4.h because of compatibility issue. > - fix the bug which cannot find the target conntrack. > > BTW, getorigdst() for IPv6 connection is really useful ? IPv6 connections > are not NATed, then I think it's meaningless to call it. > If it looks like it's useless, deleting it is fine with me. > If not, please apply patches I send (08, 09). sorry for takeing so long with this. I've applied patches 01-07 and removed getorigdst(), thanks a lot. Regards Patrick