From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] goto port to ipv6
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 03:44:05 +0200
Message-ID: <426310E5.2030207@trash.net>
References: <425CD235.7060909@outerspace.dyndns.org>
	<4262E109.2010804@trash.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61.0504180304580.4321@filer.marasystems.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@marasystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504180304580.4321@filer.marasystems.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> BTW: Can anyone remeber why it was decided not to submit the
>> goto patch at last years workshop?
> 
> 
> I don't remember exacly, but I think it wasn't considered an important 
> feature to have.

But it's a useful feature. If this was the only reason, I think we
should submit it for both IPv4 and IPv6.

Regards
Patrick