From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4263E641.9010100@kaigai.gr.jp> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 01:54:25 +0900 From: KaiGai Kohei MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Smalley Cc: "Christopher J. PeBenito" , "SELinux-ML(NSA)" , James Morris Subject: Re: [POLICY/PATCH] IA-64 Boot Partition References: <4260B74B.3000002@kaigai.gr.jp> <1113666959.6081.25.camel@sgc.columbia.tresys.com> <42613C72.5060408@kaigai.gr.jp> <1113827271.28051.39.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1113827271.28051.39.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Hi, >>BTW, what archtectures are used and checked by SELinux's people ? >>For example, kernel panic is occured on the 2.6.6 or former kernel for IA-64 >>when SELinux is enabled. This phenomenon have been overlooked. >> >>I can validate the evidence on IA64/i386 environment. >>Is there a person who can try to run SELinux on infrequent(not i386) plathome? > > > All of my machines are x86, so I'm afraid I can't be of much help there. In Japan, Secure-OS such as SELinux is hoped for embedded computing field, because applying the latest security patch for those application is not as easy as one for our desktop PC. So, I wonder who did evaluate the behavior on ARM/MIPS archtecture. # This is NOT NEC's bussiness requirement, my personal interresting. :-) Thanks, -- DO NOTHING IS THE WORST POLICY. KaiGai Kohei -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.