From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Taylor, Grant" Subject: Re: TTL Examples Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:24:00 -0500 Message-ID: <4266D680.7090802@riverviewtech.net> References: <060601c54572$90801ab0$09603fca@southern> <42663E7E.6050201@hotpop.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <42663E7E.6050201@hotpop.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Georgi Alexandrov Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org > This is pointless ... as the user on the other side can increase their > TTL value the same way you decreased it :-) Not exactly. If you use the "--ttl-dec" yes it would be sort of futile as the client on the other side could artificially inflate his / her TTL. HOWEVER if you use the "--ttl-set" then you could set the TTL to be what ever you want irregardless of what it was set to when it came in to your router. Grant. . . .