From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix NAT TCP sequence adjustment Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:41:58 +0200 Message-ID: <426704E6.5050703@trash.net> References: <4250FA72.3020502@trash.net> <20050404204716.GA4067@linuxace.com> <20050406044806.GA9711@linuxace.com> <4263108E.1030707@trash.net> <20050419005847.GA591@linuxace.com> <42666F4C.5080706@trash.net> <20050420155308.GA7057@linuxace.com> <42667E51.3060005@trash.net> <20050420172406.GB7057@linuxace.com> <42669674.3020905@trash.net> <20050420182505.GA7612@linuxace.com> <4266CC05.5040103@rtij.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Welte , Rusty Russell , netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Martijn Lievaart In-Reply-To: <4266CC05.5040103@rtij.nl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Martijn Lievaart wrote: > Some Windows graphical FTP frontends do multiple transfers. I think one > should take these into account. OTOH, how often do PORT commands arrive > out of sequence even given that it is possible? These clients most likely open up multiple control connections. But it doesn't really matter, this function is not directly related to FTP and it needs to work properly in all cases. Regards Patrick