From: Steven Kath <steven.kath@vyatta.com>
To: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@genband.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: any way to reset all marked connections when using CONNMARK?
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:11:56 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <426866445.661.1297462316364.JavaMail.root@tahiti.vyatta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <256863566.648.1297461959805.JavaMail.root@tahiti.vyatta.com>
----- "Chris Friesen" <chris.friesen@genband.com> wrote: -----
> We've got a scenario where we want to use CONNMARK to mark connections
> that have passed a large number of rules in order to allow packets
> from those connections to skip rules in the future (for performance
> reasons).
>
> However, when we add new rules we want to ensure that all the
> connections need to pass the new rules as well.
>
> It has been proposed to add a custom patch to clear the mark for all
> marked connections--is there a better way of doing this?
>
> I thought maybe we could use the CONNMARK as a generation count and
> bumping it up each time a rule is added. This would require updating
> the bypass rule each time we modify the other rules though. If there
> are better options I'd like to hear them.
Using conntrack-tools might help:
conntrack --update --mark 0
next parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-11 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <256863566.648.1297461959805.JavaMail.root@tahiti.vyatta.com>
2011-02-11 22:11 ` Steven Kath [this message]
2011-02-11 21:24 any way to reset all marked connections when using CONNMARK? Chris Friesen
2011-02-12 11:42 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-15 22:06 ` Chris Friesen
2011-02-15 22:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-02-17 18:58 ` Chris Friesen
2011-02-17 20:24 ` /dev/rob0
2011-03-01 11:47 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=426866445.661.1297462316364.JavaMail.root@tahiti.vyatta.com \
--to=steven.kath@vyatta.com \
--cc=chris.friesen@genband.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.