From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nivedita Singhvi Subject: Re: Xen bugzilla Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:06:37 -0700 Message-ID: <4269210D.2000501@us.ibm.com> References: <1114184000.23365.177.camel@plym.cl.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1114184000.23365.177.camel@plym.cl.cam.ac.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: James Bulpin Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org James Bulpin wrote: > Folks, > > As requested we now have a bugzilla bug tracker for the Xen project. It > is available at http://bugzilla.xensource.com/ > > Registration is required to submit and modify bug reports. We hope to > support anonymous reports in the near future. > > Please let me know of any problems or suggestions, extra components, > categories, etc. desired. Excellent job, guys, much thanks! I logged in and could create an account in under a 30 seconds, email exchange and all. Just a few trivial questions: 1. The Component field has the following: Guest-OS, Hardware support, hypervisor, tools and unspecified. Would dom0 issues be spread out across the non-GuestOS category? Commonest problems reported: - build/compile/boot - configuration of networking/storage devices Where would those go? 2. The Version field has 2.0, unstable, unspecified. Do you want -testing as a separate category or in the 2.0 bucket? Are you going to add the individual releases 2.0.4, 2.0.5, etc? The finer granularity in the Version field does make it easier to search - especially once you have a long history :). thanks, Nivedita