From: "Taylor, Grant" <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: REDIRCT vs. DNAT...
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 17:12:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <426976D9.2010009@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
Are there any merits to using REDIRECT over (or under) DNAT when redirecting traffic back to the box that is doing the redirecting? Reference Alejandro Villarroel's post (and thread) at https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter/2005-April/059942.html.
I responded with an email stating to REDIRECT the traffic only moments after Jason Opperisano responded stating to DNAT the traffic. I'm just curious if any one knows of any performance benefits / penalties for using REDIRECT vs. DNAT.
Grant. . . .
next reply other threads:[~2005-04-22 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-22 22:12 Taylor, Grant [this message]
2005-04-22 22:24 ` REDIRCT vs. DNAT Jason Opperisano
2005-04-22 22:30 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-04-23 8:05 ` Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=426976D9.2010009@riverviewtech.net \
--to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.