From: Daniel Lopes <lopsch@lopsch.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: ddos / no connection tracking / tarpitting
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 01:05:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42698350.1060400@lopsch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0504221707050.15167@darkstar.sysinfo.com>
R. DuFresne schrieb:
>
> the only way to really survive a ddos without affecting connectivity in
> any shapoe or form is to have a bigger pipe then the other end<s> does.
> idiots trying to ddos from a cable connection or dialup are not a
> problem and sufferable. Those a tad higher in technical advancement
> with a bot net and tousands of zomies to attack from are likely to bring
> even the biggest pipes to a dead halt, at least getting in and our of
> the firewall gateway is impossible. Traffic on the inside should be
> unaffected.
>
> I've suffered attacks with a firewall not doing connection tracking and
> had no problems with either the firewall failing or suffereing a reboot.
> I have yet to suffer such an attack on a staeful firewall, but tend to
> think I should suffer no less with such a firewall in place as apposed
> to an the older mere packet filters I've been replacing over time.
> Course, it helps to have enough RAM in the firewall in the firstplace...
>
> pipes size and RAM, them be the keys to surviival.
>
> Thanks,
>
That´s the point. With professional DDoS attacks we are talking about
people using their botnets and zombies and in total they can reach a
bandwidth beyond the Gbit border. Not really easy to handle such packet
storm ;).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-22 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-22 4:19 ddos / no connection tracking / tarpitting Vic N
2005-04-22 4:32 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-04-22 4:45 ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-22 5:01 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-04-22 5:22 ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-22 6:50 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-04-22 6:52 ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-22 21:13 ` R. DuFresne
2005-04-22 22:12 ` Seferovic Edvin
[not found] ` <42697714.011dd32f.69e7.219fSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.gmail.com>
2005-04-22 22:18 ` Fabien Germain
2005-04-22 22:28 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-04-22 23:05 ` Daniel Lopes [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-22 7:01 Gary W. Smith
2005-04-22 7:05 Gary W. Smith
2005-04-22 7:10 ` Taylor Grant
2005-04-22 7:32 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42698350.1060400@lopsch.com \
--to=lopsch@lopsch.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.