From: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@intracom.gr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] struct NS16550 {...} __attribute__ ((packed)) at ns16550.h
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:18:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <426D0A4C.5000105@intracom.gr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050425145653.E9CCDC1510@atlas.denx.de>
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <001501c5499f$f5364750$1780a8c0@art> you wrote:
>
>>>If this is really true, then there is either bug in GCC or in the code.
>>>If I code a 32 bit access the compiler must not use any other accesses.
>>
>>If you use __attribute__ ((packed)), you are telling the compiler you have
>>an unaligned data structure (e.g. longs not by-4 aligned). Therefore, GCC
>>will always reassemble the 32-bit value from byte accesses.
>
>
> You are wrong, with both of your statements.
>
> -> cat foo.c
> struct foo {
> unsigned long foo1;
> unsigned long foo2;
> unsigned long foo3;
> } __attribute__ ((packed));
>
> unsigned long dummy (struct foo *p)
> {
> return (p->foo1 + p->foo2 + p->foo3);
> }
>
>
> Test 1: PowerPC:
>
> -> ppc_8xx-gcc -O -S foo.c
> -> cat foo.s
> ...
> dummy:
> mr 9,3
> lwz 3,0(3)
> lwz 0,4(9)
> add 3,3,0
> lwz 0,8(9)
> add 3,3,0
> blr
>
>
> Test 2: MIPS:
>
> -> mips_4KC-gcc -O -S foo.c
> -> cat foo.s
> ...
> dummy:
> .frame $sp,0,$31 # vars= 0, regs= 0/0, args= 0, extra= 0
> .mask 0x00000000,0
> .fmask 0x00000000,0
> .set noreorder
> .cpload $25
> .set reorder
> ulw $2,0($4)
> ulw $3,4($4)
> #nop
> addu $2,$2,$3
> ulw $3,8($4)
> .set noreorder
> .set nomacro
> j $31
> addu $2,$2,$3
> .set macro
> .set reorder
>
>
> As you can see, GCC alway uses plain word accesses (32 bit).
>
>
>
Not on ARM it does not.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
Both PPC & MIPS can do proper unalligned load/stores (or fault to
an exception).
ARM (silently) does the wrong thing i.e. masks out the lower 2 bits.
So gcc on ARM generates byte load/stores.
Regards
Pantelis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-25 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-22 14:57 [U-Boot-Users] struct NS16550 {...} __attribute__ ((packed)) at ns16550.h Woojung.Huh at smsc.com
2005-04-22 18:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-25 7:44 ` Jean-Paul Saman
2005-04-25 8:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-25 14:06 ` Arthur Shipkowski
2005-04-25 14:56 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-25 15:18 ` Pantelis Antoniou [this message]
2005-04-25 19:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-25 20:15 ` Arthur Shipkowski
2005-04-25 20:59 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-26 6:23 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2005-04-26 7:21 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-26 14:32 ` Cory Tusar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-22 18:55 Woojung.Huh at smsc.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=426D0A4C.5000105@intracom.gr \
--to=panto@intracom.gr \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.