From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacob Gorm Hansen Subject: First result from small address spaces Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:58:53 -0700 Message-ID: <426ED5BD.6010709@diku.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org hi, I finally have a setup where I can measure I/O performance of stock vs. my own 'small address spaces' enabled version of Xen. Doing a simple iperf -w256K with the client in domU and the server on a remote machine, everything without hyper-threading and using bridged networking. Stock xen : 574MBits/s SAS xen: 620MBits/s Not massive, but an 8% improvement in this one case. I suspect that in general, this only makes a real difference if the domU doing something useful with the CPU other than feeding data into a socket. Where can I adjust the thresholds for buffering of packets and interrupts? Jacob