All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Timofei V. Bondarenko" <timm@ipi.ac.ru>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: nand locking
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:27:41 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <426F691D.50905@ipi.ac.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1114598706.879.185.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de>

Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>It would be nice to unlock the rw partitions only.
>>But it's weird a bit:
>>the mtd_partition may be incomplete before add_mtd_partitions() done.
>>After add_mtd_partitions() my startap code has no handle to actual 
>>partition info.
>>The mtd_partition.mtdp seems only choice, though it prevents partitions 
>>from registering...
>>So, could couple of lines in add_mtd_partitions() do that work?
> 
> 
> I'm not quite understanding, what your problem is.
> 
> Lock/unlock are general features and should be added to nand_base.c.
> I guess the chips which have those functions can be identified and an
> appropriate option flag set in the ID list, which then lets nand_scan
> decide whether to fill in the lock/unlock function pointers or not.

An easy problem: I'm looking for the simplest way to protect
read-only mtd partitions by hardware lock.
The current nand_base seems lack of this feature.
Should i hack the nand_base? Or is there a correct workaround?

>>I've already sent one as attacment, but that message gets bounced
>>"awaits moderator approval".
> 
> Thats list policy. Attachments have to be approved

It awaits since 18 Apr - longer than a week... is it ok?
Are there other ways to submit a patch? (a small bugfix to cmdlinepart).
AFAIK, placing diffs into message text is not welcomed too.

Thanks.
	Timofei.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-27 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-27  7:34 nand locking Timofei V. Bondarenko
2005-04-27  9:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-04-27  9:09   ` Timofei V. Bondarenko
2005-04-27 10:45     ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-04-27 10:27       ` Timofei V. Bondarenko [this message]
2005-04-27 10:32         ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-27 11:35         ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-04-27 11:19           ` Timofei V. Bondarenko
2005-04-27 18:27     ` Todd Poynor
2005-04-28  7:00       ` Timofei V. Bondarenko
2005-04-29 22:19         ` Todd Poynor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=426F691D.50905@ipi.ac.ru \
    --to=timm@ipi.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.