From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:41:27 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Internal Qdisc Message-Id: <426F6C57.9020606@cenrik.net> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Hi TBF provides traffic shaping by the Token Bucket theory, while SFQ makes sure(actually just hints) swap packets in different sessions so that no particular session will hang around for a long time. Leo R Harper wrote: > Hell > I'm new to Qdisc programming and I was wondering, what is the difference > between using an internal Qdisc (like e.g. TBF does) vs. not using > internal Qdisc (like e.g. SFQ does)? >=20 > Can someone give me a quick rundown of pro and cons? >=20 > with regards > R.harper >=20 > _________________________________________________________________ > Undg=81=7F pop-ups med MSN Toolbar - http://toolbar.msn.dk hent den grat= is! >=20 > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list > LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc >=20 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc