From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Furniss Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 13:45:58 +0000 Subject: Re: AW: [LARTC] urgent question about tcng! Message-Id: <42778096.5080905@dsl.pipex.com> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Thomas Mandl wrote: > Hello Everybody, > > I forgot to mention, that my HTTP traffic will not be handled by an apache > web server, and the HTTP protocol can be replaced in the near future by a > different protocol. Thus apache's mod_bandwith isn't an option for me right > now. > > I'm not sure how Wang Jian's post can help me. I thought the existing Linux > 2.6.11 kernel and tcng already can do what I need? All I have to do is write > a proper tcng config file... > > But the proper tcng file is the challenge... I don't know tcng, but the reason I suggested perflow is that you want each flow to have a ceil - unless you make a class and rule to match each flow I can't see how you can do this. Also iptables could limit the number of connections - tc can't, perflow can. Andy. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc