From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 14:42:46 +0000
Subject: Re: AW: [LARTC] urgent question about tcng!
Message-Id: <42778DE6.8010304@dsl.pipex.com>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <PDC8QMTiuEmmfnUmLbx00000035@pdc.ikarus.local>
In-Reply-To: <PDC8QMTiuEmmfnUmLbx00000035@pdc.ikarus.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

Andy Furniss wrote:

> 
> I don't know tcng, but the reason I suggested perflow is that you want 
> each flow to have a ceil - unless you make a class and rule to match 
> each flow I can't see how you can do this. Also iptables could limit the 
> number of connections - tc can't, perflow can.

Forgot to say you can also use iptables to limit rate per connection.

Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc