All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herta Van den Eynde <herta.vandeneynde@cc.kuleuven.be>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mdadm create size problem
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 12:12:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4278A023.3040004@cc.kuleuven.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42789B24.6040206@cc.kuleuven.be>

FWIIW, I reverted to mdadm-1.4.0-1, and that version creates the RAID1+0 
just fine.

Herta

Herta Van den Eynde wrote:
> OK, there's definitely something wrong here.  I ran a
> # mdadm --zero-superblock --force /dev/sdX
> followed by
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX bs=64k
> where X=[g-in-p], and when I try to create a RAID 1 using two of these
> devices, it still sets the size to 139904K.  When I create a RAID 0
> using the same devices, mdadm does set the size correctly.
> 
> # mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md6 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdh
> /dev/sdo
> mdadm: size set to 139904K
> mdadm: array /dev/md6 started.
> 
> # mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md6 --level=0 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdh
> /dev/sdo
> mdadm: chunk size defaults to 64K
> mdadm: array /dev/md6 started.
> # mke2fs -j -v  /dev/md6
> (...)
> # mount /dev/md6 /mnt; df /mnt
> Filesystem           1k-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/md6             141124600     32828 133923052   1% /mnt
> 
> Is this a bug, or am I overlooking something?
> 
> Herta
> 
> 
> Herta Van den Eynde wrote:
> 
>> Red Hat AS 2.1 mdadm 1.11
>> I have two devices that used to be part of a now corrupt RAID10 
>> configuration.  When I try to reuse them to create a RAID1, it only 
>> uses about 1 third of the diskspace available.
>> # fdisk -l /dev/sdg
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdg: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 8924 cylinders
>> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
>>
>>    Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id  System
>> /dev/sdg1             1      8924  71681998+  fd  Linux raid autodetect
>>
>> # fdisk -l /dev/sdn
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdn: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 8924 cylinders
>> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
>>
>>    Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id  System
>> /dev/sdn1             1      8924  71681998+  fd  Linux raid autodetect
>>
>> # mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md5 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 
>> /dev/sdg /dev/sdn
>> mdadm: /dev/sdg appears to contain an ext2fs file system
>>     size=419520K  mtime=Mon May  2 17:04:04 2005
>> mdadm: /dev/sdn appears to contain an ext2fs file system
>>     size=419520K  mtime=Mon May  2 17:04:04 2005
>> mdadm: size set to 139904K
>> Continue creating array? n
>>
>> If I try to add the --size option, even a size that is 139904K or 
>> less, it tells me the size is invalid:
>>
>> # mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md5 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 
>> /dev/sdg /dev/sdn --size=139904K
>> mdadm: invalid size: 139904K
>>
>> I did reboot the system after fdisk'ing the devices.
>>
>> Do I need to low-level format these devices to be able to reuse them?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Herta
>>
> 

-- 
Herta Van den Eynde              -=- Toledo system management
K.U. Leuven - Ludit              -=- phone: +32 (0)16 322 166
                                  -=- 50°51'27" N 004°40'39" E

"I wish I were two little cats.  Then I could play together."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-04 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-03 13:53 mdadm create size problem Herta Van den Eynde
2005-05-04  9:51 ` Herta Van den Eynde
2005-05-04 10:12   ` Herta Van den Eynde [this message]
2005-05-04 10:24     ` Tyler
2005-05-04 10:42       ` Herta Van den Eynde
2005-05-23 23:43 ` Neil Brown
2005-05-24  7:26   ` Luca Berra
2005-05-24 10:51     ` Neil Brown
2005-05-24 11:34       ` Luca Berra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4278A023.3040004@cc.kuleuven.be \
    --to=herta.vandeneynde@cc.kuleuven.be \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.