From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: When Reiser4 will be officially included in the kernel? ...
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 13:33:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4278C117.7020805@superbug.demon.co.uk>
References: <42727F32.60301@futuretg.com> <1115198582.4456.32.camel@tribesman.namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-23974-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <1115198582.4456.32.camel@tribesman.namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Vladimir Saveliev <vs@namesys.com>
Cc: "Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando" <gorlando@futuretg.com>, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
> Hello
> 
> On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 22:38, Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando wrote:
> 
>>Hi Everyone,
>>
>>    Looking on the latest 2.6.11.4, I don't see yet Reiser4 officially 
>>included between the supported FS.
>>
>>    Reiser4 had been released almost one year ago, and ... does not 
>>belong yet to the kernel?
>>
>>    Hans, do you know some date for this?
>>
>>    In the past Andrew Morton, did this job, I don't know who (if 
>>someone) are working on this matter.
>>
>>    It is not fundamental, just a simple but important curiosity.
>>
> 
> 
> We are working to address lkml objections (they objected to core kernel
> patches reiser4 relays on) and reiser4 stability.
> When it is done (can not estimate, sorry) - then we will ask for
> inclusion. 
> 
> 
>>Thanks,
>>Giovanni.
>>

What exactly did they object to? Are their objections easily addressed?

James