Re: read-only git repositories (ancient history)

["David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com>]

David Lang wrote:
> given that git already treats everything in the object storage as being 
> fixed it occured to me that there may be value in makeing it so that git 
> can make use of more then one pool of storage
...
> there are probably other uses and it seems like a fairly small 
> modification to add a hook to use if the object isn't found initially 
> that I thought I'd mention it to the group.

Reasonable.  Another use would be to have a repository with
"ancient history" (e.g., Linux pre-2.6) that isn't normally
loaded or looked at, but COULD be looked at if you added
that repository.  For that use, though, you'd need a way to
record "the parent of X is Y" since the information creating
connections BETWEEN the repositories might not be stored in
the later repository itself (see the discussions about Linux kernel
history recreation).

--- David A. Wheeler