All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Bath <jbath@ckua.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] packet shaping bridge
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 17:49:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <427BAE12.1040206@ckua.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <427A4932.7000002@ckua.org>

Thanks!  Adding the filter to the root was the trick.  From the various 
documentation I was reading I had the impression that the filter needed 
to be added to the sub-classes - 1:1 and so forth.  I presume that's 
only appropriate when you have leaves below 1:1.

Anyhow, the trick now is figuring out how I want to configure things 
with two of these bridges in mind.  The topology would look like this:

Switch-bridge/filter-WAN router--Remote WAN router-bridge-remote switch

Now with 1.5Mbit/s with the potential for 2mbit/s I was thinking of 
limiting each bridge at 1Mbit/s. I didn't want to limit at 750kbit/s 
because if you're doing a big file transfer, you're going to suffer and 
besides, the ratio of download to upload is in favour of the download 
The streaming audio devices are set up for 128kbit/s MPEG-layer3.  So 
we're looking at dedicating a minimum of 150kbit/s which can double or 
more if I'm having congestion problems.

Now here's an interesting idea.  Let me know if it's possible or not. 
Is it possible for me to create a bridge between the two linux boxes so 
it physically looks like

eth0 eth1 --WAN--  eth1 eth0

but virtually you are going

eth0 ------- eth0

The reason I ask this is so I can create an awareness between the two 
bridges as to how much traffic is actually going through the pipe so I 
may optimize it to its fullest.

I suppose that it could be done via snmp or spanning-tree?


Thanks again.



Jason Bath
Network Administrator
CKUA Radio Network
780.428.2017


Andy Furniss wrote:
> Jason Bath wrote:
> 
>> I'm currently tweaking but this is what I have for now:
>> -----------------------
>> #!/bin/sh
>>
>> DEV=eth0
>> #setup the root
>>
>> #tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 11
> 
> 
> Remember arp traffic will go to default unless you filter elsewhere.
> 
>> tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps ceil 100kbps
>> #Tokyo class
>> tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 50kbps ceil 
>> 100kbps
> 
> 
> I would use rate 90 ceil 100 prio 0
> 
>> #Everything else
>> tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 50kbps ceil 
>> 100kbps
> 
> 
> rate 10 ceil 100 prio 1 quantum 1500 (or your mtu) burst 10b cburst 10b
> 
>>
>> #filter for streaming
>> tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:1 protocol ip prio 0 u32 match ip src 
>> 10.2.1.7 match ip dport 2001 0xffff flowid 1:10
> 
> 
> Filters don't work as you need to add them to 1:0 also prio 0 is not 
> highest for a filter - use 1
> 
>> tc filter add dev $DEV protocol ip parent 1:1 prio 0 u32 match ip src 
>> 10.2.1.5 match ip dport 2001 0xffff flowid 1:10
>>
>> #filter for my workstation
>> tc filter add dev $DEV protocol ip parent 1:1 prio 3 u32 match ip src 
>> 10.2.1.251 flowid 1:10
> 
> 
> If your workstation generates bulk traffic don't put it with stream - 
> make another class.
> 
>>
>> #all other traffic sent to the other queue
>> tc filter add dev $DEV protocol ip parent 1:1 prio 3 u32 match ip src 
>> 0.0.0.0/0 flowid 1:11
> 
> 
> Not really needed if you use default 11 but remember arp - if you omit 
> default 11 then leave this and arp will pass unshaped.
> 
> 
>> tc qdisc add dev $DEV parent 1:10 handle 10: pfifo limit 2
> 
> 
> two packets seems a bit low - maybe use a short bfifo to limit to a 
> couple big packets (3k) but still allow more small.
> 
>> tc qdisc add dev $DEV parent 1:11 handle 11: sfq perturb 2
> 
> 
> perturb causes packet reordering 2 is too low use min 10 or higher.
> 
> Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-06 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-05 16:26 [LARTC] packet shaping bridge Jason Bath
2005-05-05 21:58 ` Jason Bath
2005-05-05 22:20 ` Andreas Klauer
2005-05-05 22:51 ` Andy Furniss
2005-05-06 17:49 ` Jason Bath [this message]
2005-05-09 22:26 ` Andy Furniss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=427BAE12.1040206@ckua.org \
    --to=jbath@ckua.org \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.