From: Jakub Jermar <jermar@itbs.cz>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: len.brown@intel.com, "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>,
torvalds@osdl.org, aul.s.diefenbaugh@intel.com,
jun.nakajima@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: acpi_find_rsdp() diverges from ACPI specification
Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 00:21:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <427BEDF7.3010508@itbs.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050429144321.3398db9a.rddunlap@osdl.org>
Hello,
here I resend corrected patch for acpi_find_rsdp().
Please, apply this patch.
--- linux-2.6.11.7/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c 2005-04-07 20:58:17.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.11.7-acpi-patch/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c 2005-04-29 21:39:08.000000000 +0200
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ acpi_find_rsdp (void)
*/
rsdp_phys = acpi_scan_rsdp (0, 0x400);
if (!rsdp_phys)
- rsdp_phys = acpi_scan_rsdp (0xE0000, 0xFFFFF);
+ rsdp_phys = acpi_scan_rsdp (0xE0000, 128*1024);
return rsdp_phys;
}
Best regards,
Jakub
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:03:50 +0200 jermar@itbs.cz wrote:
>
> | Hello,
> |
> | I found out that acpi_find_rsdp() tries to find the RSDP structure in an area
> | bit larger than the ACPI specification wants. The right interval should start
> | at 0xe0000 and end at 0xfffff. The search area is thus 128K+1B large.
>
> The search area is thus 128 KB large, so I agree with the intent of
> this patch, except for the +1B.
>
>
> | Given the semantics of acpi_scan_rsdp(), the second argument should therefore be
> | the size, not the end address.
>
> Yes.
>
> | Should there be any comments, please email me directly as I don't regularily
> | read LKM.
> |
> | Please, apply.
> |
> | Jakub
> |
> | --- linux-2.6.11.7/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c 2005-04-07 20:58:17.000000000
> | +0200
> | +++ linux-2.6.11.7-acpi-patch/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/boot.c 2005-04-29
> | 21:39:08.000000000 +0200
> | @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ acpi_find_rsdp (void)
> | */
> | rsdp_phys = acpi_scan_rsdp (0, 0x400);
> | if (!rsdp_phys)
> | - rsdp_phys = acpi_scan_rsdp (0xE0000, 0xFFFFF);
> | + rsdp_phys = acpi_scan_rsdp (0xE0000, 128*1024 + 1);
> Just drop the "+ 1".
>
> |
> | return rsdp_phys;
> | }
>
>
> ---
> ~Randy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-06 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-29 21:03 PATCH: acpi_find_rsdp() diverges from ACPI specification jermar
2005-04-29 21:43 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-05-06 22:21 ` Jakub Jermar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=427BEDF7.3010508@itbs.cz \
--to=jermar@itbs.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=aul.s.diefenbaugh@intel.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.