From: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] core-git documentation update
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 22:26:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <427E83EA.2000104@dgreaves.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vd5s15up8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1226 bytes --]
Junio C Hamano wrote:
>David, thanks for taking time to update the document. I ended
>up hand merging your two patches since I had a bit more
>documentation updates in git-jc tree, so I'd like you to
>proofread the result.
>
>
This merged fine.
Purely for editorial consistency I added "" around the command - see patch
The intention now was for me to go through Linus' HEAD and verify the
docs actually documented the HEAD.
Then I think comparing the HEAD to jit-jc and preparing patches for that?
>It is my understanding that if I have a correct patch result
>from your patch 1 and patch 2, I can throw away this message:
>
> Subject: [FILES] core-git documentation update
>
>Am I correct?
>
>
yes - that was just to assist people in reading the docs without having
to apply patches etc etc.
>I intend to keep not-so-controvercial stuff in git-jc tree, so
>that when Linus returns he can pull from it instead of patching
>from a pile of e-mails, potentially risking to leave good stuff
>in his mailbox during that process.
>
>
I had hoped you'd pick this up in that manner - thanks
David
PS Removed Linus from cc
Add quotes for editorial consistency
Signed-off-by: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
---
[-- Attachment #2: core-git_editorial.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 614 bytes --]
Documentation/core-git.txt: needs update
Index: Documentation/core-git.txt
===================================================================
--- 08cd7ce14ca4da7db37dce88e416e67b01f3452a/Documentation/core-git.txt (mode:100644 sha1:e046119fcdd948dec81b11376ec9198e76a109af)
+++ uncommitted/Documentation/core-git.txt (mode:100644)
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@
-m::
By default, files recorded in the index but not checked
out are reported as deleted. This flag makes
- git-diff-cache say that all non-checked-out files are up
+ "git-diff-cache" say that all non-checked-out files are up
to date.
Output format
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-08 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-08 17:22 [PATCH 0/2] core-git documentation update David Greaves
2005-05-08 19:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-05-08 21:01 ` David Greaves
2005-05-08 20:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-05-08 21:26 ` David Greaves [this message]
2005-05-08 23:35 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=427E83EA.2000104@dgreaves.com \
--to=david@dgreaves.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.