From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DUuTd-00044n-GH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 18:42:21 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DUuTb-00043S-Tx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 18:42:20 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DUuTb-00043P-Q4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 18:42:19 -0400
Received: from [217.204.41.189] (helo=kula.newsnow.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DUuXi-0008Pq-4D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2005 18:46:34 -0400
Received: from r3j188.chello.upc.cz ([213.220.201.188] helo=[192.168.0.4])
	by kula.newsnow.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1DUuQC-00086Y-00
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 08 May 2005 23:38:48 +0100
Message-ID: <427E9557.7020107@praguespringpeople.org>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 00:40:23 +0200
From: Struan Bartlett <struan@praguespringpeople.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Kqemu charged?
References: <200505081536.56882.collinm@laboiteaprog.com>	<2ad73a05050814006a0cac2e@mail.gmail.com>
	<200505081712.53846.collinm@laboiteaprog.com>
In-Reply-To: <200505081712.53846.collinm@laboiteaprog.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Marc Collin wrote:

>Le 8 Mai 2005 17:00, André Braga a écrit :
>  
>
>>Unless you have 2 instances of QEMU running, no, you're not supposed to.
>>    
>>
>0 means kqemu is ok?
>  
>
I don't think so. The way I see it, when I'm running _one_ instance of 
QEMU, lsmod lists:

kqemu                  43428  2

When I run QEMU with the '-no-kqemu' option lsmod lists:

kqemu                  43428  0

Struan