From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Furniss Subject: Re: Help: iptables NAT broken with pppoe Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 11:36:55 +0100 Message-ID: <42808EC7.80805@dsl.pipex.com> References: <1115397393l.3864l.0l@antares.localdomain> <427C5C41.3010407@riverviewtech.net> <1115496014l.3549l.0l@antares.localdomain> <427EFB7D.8010503@riverviewtech.net> <1115663859l.3308l.0l@antares.localdomain> <427FAF51.9000102@riverviewtech.net> <42808D9C.2000603@dsl.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <42808D9C.2000603@dsl.pipex.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Andy Furniss Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, "Taylor, Grant" Andy Furniss wrote: > Taylor, Grant wrote: > >>> Set them all to either 0 or 1 - still the same picture, the reply >>> from the remote server results (in tcpdump) in the one with "win 0" >>> being sent back instead of passing it to eth0. >> >> >> >> Hmm. Would it be possible to see the output of iptables-save? I'm >> just wondering if there is something else in the mix that is messing >> things up. >> >>> Any idea whom I could ask here for help? Maybe the Linux kernel >>> mailing list? Or is there a more specialised one for networking issues? >> >> >> >> Sorry, I don't know off hand where to send you. Any one else have any >> advice here? > > > One thought - the tcpdump is incomplete by just looking at port 80 you > can't see what ICMP are being sent. > > Andy. Add OP to CC