Christian Limpach wrote:
> On 5/12/05, Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@intel.com> wrote:
> 
>>phys is machine physical already. So we shouldn't try to convert guest physical to machine physical.
> 
> 
> Are you sure that the test a few lines further down shouldn't use (a
> to be defined -- see i386) pte_val_ma to compare the currently
> installed pte with the to-be-installed one?  You might be comparing
> random values otherwise...
> 

Sounds reasonable. I tested that this incremental patch doesn't cause 
any new regressions.

	-Arun