Re: The future of PageAnonExclusive

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 11.12.24 16:45, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 03:49:12PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 11.12.24 15:25, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>> On 11/12/2024 11:56, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> Now CCing the correct Willy :)
>>>>
>>>> On 11.12.24 12:55, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> PageAnonExclusive (PAE) is working very reliable at this point. But
>>>>> especially in the context of THPs (large folios) we'd like to do better:
>>>>>
>>>>> (1) For PTE-mapped THP, we have to maintain it per page. We'd like to
>>>>>         avoid per-page flags as good as possible (e.g., waste in "struct
>>>>>         page",  touching many cachelines).
>>>
>>> Presumably also important for the Glorious Future where struct page is just a
>>> pointer and struct folio (et al) is allocated dynamically?
>>
>> I think Willy mentioned that there might be ways to encode it in the 8-byte
>> for the "tail" pages.
> 
> Yes.  For anon memory, the page->memdesc has a 4-bit 'type' and the
> remaining 60 bits is a pointer to a struct folio (allocated from a slab
> with 16 byte alignment).  The current list of types [1] has file folios
> as type 2 and anon folios as type 3.  We could allocate a type to be
> 'anon exclusive', thus essentially giving us an anon-exclusive bit.

Right.

> 
> [1] https://kernelnewbies.org/MatthewWilcox/Memdescs
> 
> Don't get too excited about "we're almost out of types".  The "managed"
> type has subtypes.  We could also collapse "file" and "anon" into a
> single type and distinguish between them with a bit in the folio.
> 
> Anyway, yes, we can do one per-page flag.  Two per-page flags starts to
> get dicey.

hwpoison? :/

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb