All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: chris stones <chris.stones@gmail.com>
To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: cpu-freq causing kernel lock-up after upgrading to 1GB ram.
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 17:37:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42877AB1.8050100@gmail.com> (raw)

This is my first attempt at a bug report, so forgive me for making a 
mess, I will try my best.

-------------------------
hardware:
-------------------------
mobo: Chaintech VNF3-250
chipset: nForce-3
CPU: amd64 Athlon 3400+
Ram: 2 * Kingston 512Meg DDR400 PC3200 2T timeing 3-3-8-3. (total 1GB)
Swap : 1.3 Gb.

--------------------------
software:
--------------------------
Distro: Gentoo 2005.0 (comiped as 64bit with multilib)
GCC: gcc version 3.4.3 20041125 (Gentoo Linux 3.4.3-r1, ssp-3.4.3-0, 
pie-8.7.7)
kernel versions: gentoo 2.6.11-r7; vanilla-2.6.10; vanilla-2.6.11.9

--------------------------
description:
--------------------------
I have been using the modules freq_table, cpufreq_ondemand, powernow_k8 
to regulate my cpu clock for over 6 months with the hardware 
configureation shown above, minus one 512meg ram module.

Recently, i shutdown the box, and added the second memory module.
At the time, the cpu_fre drivers were compiled into the kernel, shortly 
after booting, the system would freese when cpu_freq lowered my cpu to 
its idle state of 1Ghz.

These conditions must all be met to cause the lock-up.
1) Both Ram moodules are used (1GB ram)
2) the modules freq_table, cpufreq_ondemand, powernow_k8 are loaded.
3) The lockup occurs when the cpu is slowing down from a period of heavy 
load.

2 hours running memtest86 shows that my memory is not the problem.

one one occasion, the kernel gave a memory dump before the freeze. i 
regret i didnt take note of its rull contents, but a function trace line 
mentioned a cpu_freq function call.

If i remove one of the 512meg memory modules, the cpu_freq 
performsperfectly, as it has for the past 6 months.

Thankyou for taking the time to read my post.
Is there anything i can do (other than go without  ram or cpu_freq) to 
solve this ?
is there any more information you require from me ?

I have googled, but found no other similar bug reports.

 From Chris.stones@gmail.com.

             reply	other threads:[~2005-05-15 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-15 16:37 chris stones [this message]
2005-05-15 23:49 ` cpu-freq causing kernel lock-up after upgrading to 1GB ram Nebojsa Trpkovic
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-16 15:19 Langsdorf, Mark
2005-05-16 17:08 ` Nebojsa Trpkovic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42877AB1.8050100@gmail.com \
    --to=chris.stones@gmail.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.