From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonas Berlin Subject: Re: Mangling IP Options fields Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 18:43:35 +0000 Message-ID: <4288E9D7.10306@outerspace.dyndns.org> References: <42889454.6040300@hoole.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Quinton Hoole In-Reply-To: <42889454.6040300@hoole.biz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Quoting Quinton Hoole on 2005-05-16 12:38 UTC: > Is mangling of IP options fields supported by netfilter/iptables? > > I've seen Fabrice's reply to a simimlar question some 3 years back: > > https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2002-March/006957.html I think nothing has changed. The IPV4OPTSSTRIP mentioned in the mail (which removes all options) is still available. You can download the latest pom-ng (through www.netfilter.org), which includes IPV4OPTSSTRIP. If you need more help regarding how to do stuff in the net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_IPV4OPTSSTRIP.c file (which is the one you should modify), just ask :) Good luck! - -- - - xkr47 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCiOnVxyF48ZTvn+4RAj5zAJwKMG2mfElgS26RV2PRwwcIGuYBPwCfdJnv RtaGxlBLe/NpODfN5b7zob4= =9Bp4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----