From: "Taylor, Grant" <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: okay, I admit confusion here;
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 16:05:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42890B1C.3010404@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0505131725190.2601@darkstar.sysinfo.com>
> I have moved from a p-p-p dialup serivce to a rr business class service
> <and learned to hate verizion>. Anyways, rr brings in a router, and
> gives me the /28 block <router takes an address>. how do I setup eht0
> and eth1 to share the same block? Is this a case for interface bridging
> and ip2route?
>
> router <-> eth1 <external> <-> eth0 <internal, connects to the home
> hub/switch>
>
> router = xxx.xxx.xxx.17
> eth1 = xxx.xxx.xxx.18
> eth0 = xxx.xxx.xxx.19
>
> Rest of the home net gets IP's 20-30
Are you REALLY wanting the rest of the (computers in your) home to have globally routable IPs? If you are wanting such I would REALLY suggest that you take a look at the NETMAP target where you would do mass translation of the IP addresses to private IPs or look at a lot of port forwarding. Why did you get a /28 block of IPs? Do you have 13 (plus the router) pieces of equipment that need to have globally routable IPs or is this just what they gave you (and are billing you for) because you have multiple computers at your house that will be using the cable modem? I have not dealt with RR in a long time so I don't know their current politics, though from what I remember they wanted to charge per system that would be accessing the net via the CM. If this is just simple home LAN internet access (IMHO) you should REALLY think about dropping back to one IP address from RR and do the same t
ype of NATing that you were doing on your PPP.
Grant. . . .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-16 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-06 15:57 SSH Brute force attacks Brent Clark
2005-05-06 16:40 ` Mogens Valentin
2005-05-06 19:29 ` R. DuFresne
2005-05-07 5:14 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-10 14:01 ` Eric Wood
2005-05-11 12:35 ` Brent Clark
2005-05-11 18:21 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-11 19:04 ` Pete Toscano
2005-05-11 19:15 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-11 19:30 ` Pete Toscano
2005-05-11 20:34 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-05-13 21:31 ` okay, I admit confusion here; R. DuFresne
2005-05-13 21:55 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-05-16 17:40 ` R. DuFresne
2005-05-16 20:55 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-16 21:05 ` Taylor, Grant [this message]
2005-05-14 7:02 ` SSH Brute force attacks Georgi Alexandrov
2005-05-14 15:47 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-05-15 20:12 ` Patrick Nelson
2005-05-17 0:49 ` Charlie Brady
2005-05-14 9:08 ` Łukasz Hejnak
2005-05-14 19:08 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-16 8:16 ` Łukasz Hejnak
2005-05-17 1:05 ` Charlie Brady
2005-05-17 5:00 ` Łukasz Hejnak
2005-05-17 5:19 ` Łukasz Hejnak
[not found] ` <42898402.10507@eccotours.dyndns.org>
2005-05-17 12:44 ` Łukasz Hejnak
2005-05-17 13:20 ` Brent Clark
2005-05-17 13:36 ` Sadus .
2005-05-17 16:06 ` Łukasz Hejnak
2005-05-17 15:21 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-18 12:39 ` Brent Clark
2005-05-19 4:55 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-19 9:05 ` Brent Clark
2005-05-19 14:39 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-20 13:01 ` Brent Clark
2005-05-20 14:53 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-23 16:31 ` Brent Clark
2005-06-02 16:13 ` Sadus .
2005-06-02 16:43 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-06-02 19:18 ` Sadus .
2005-06-13 14:39 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-06-13 16:17 ` Patrick Nelson
2005-06-13 16:27 ` /dev/rob0
2005-06-13 19:00 ` R. DuFresne
2005-05-18 16:54 ` Jim Miller
2005-05-18 17:51 ` Łukasz Hejnak
2005-05-19 2:09 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-21 8:00 ` Пётр Волков Александрович
2005-05-21 22:37 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-22 7:11 ` Пётр Волков Александрович
2005-05-22 10:09 ` Marius Mertens
2005-05-22 10:57 ` Łukasz Hejnak
2005-05-23 16:14 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-17 6:55 ` Taylor, Grant
[not found] ` <1116333615.24331.4.camel@debianbox>
2005-05-17 15:25 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-23 16:53 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-24 16:19 ` Marius Mertens
2005-05-25 5:35 ` Brent Clark
2005-05-25 8:48 ` Marius Mertens
2005-05-25 18:10 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-26 11:17 ` Brent Clark
2005-05-31 4:12 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-31 10:06 ` Brent Clark
2005-05-31 14:17 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-28 23:24 ` Sebastian Siewior
2005-05-29 1:01 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-07 5:32 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-08 15:20 ` Alistair Tonner
2005-05-08 18:51 ` Dwayne Hottinger
2005-05-08 22:57 ` Alexander Samad
2005-05-09 5:41 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-09 5:46 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-06-02 18:26 ` SSH Brute force attacks - Script version 1.0 Taylor, Grant
2005-07-25 19:41 ` Steven M Campbell
2005-07-26 6:18 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42890B1C.3010404@riverviewtech.net \
--to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.