From: "Taylor, Grant" <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Combined Internal/External DNAT question
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 16:06:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42890B63.2000603@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0505161548000.15128@darkstar.sysinfo.com>
> an interesting tidbit from the iptables man pages suggests that their is
> a built in facility for this one to one nat thingie I'm looking into here;
>
> NETMAP
> This target allows you to statically map a whole network of addresses onto another network of addresses.
> It can only be used from rules in the nat table.
>
> --to address[/mask]
> Network address to map to. The resulting address will be constructed in the following way: All
> 'one' bits in the mask are filled in from the new `address'. All bits that are zero in the mask
> are filled in from the original address.
>
> If I read this correctly, it appears to build the hash tables of
> addresses for one eh?
As I understand it the NETMAP target is used to do NATing on a large range ((sub)network) of IPs in on rule. Thus you could directly translate 192.168.0.1 <-> 172.16.0.1, 192.168.0.2 <-> 172.16.0.2, 192.168.0.n <-> 172.16.0.n, etc.
As far as your situation are you really wanting each computer on your network to have a globally routable IP? If not then you do not need / want to look at NETMAP.
Grant. . . .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-16 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <42889941.5060507@griffous.net>
2005-05-16 18:35 ` Combined Internal/External DNAT question Taylor, Grant
2005-05-16 19:27 ` R. DuFresne
2005-05-16 19:50 ` R. DuFresne
2005-05-16 21:06 ` Taylor, Grant [this message]
2005-05-21 0:28 ` filtering in which rules? R. DuFresne
2005-05-21 1:11 ` Daniel Lopes
2005-05-21 2:37 ` Taylor, Grant
2005-05-21 19:24 ` Jason Opperisano
2005-05-19 10:53 Combined Internal/External DNAT question Jonathan Wheeler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-15 16:54 Gary W. Smith
2005-05-15 16:35 Gary W. Smith
2005-05-14 5:51 Jonathan Wheeler
2005-05-15 23:56 ` Taylor, Grant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42890B63.2000603@riverviewtech.net \
--to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.