From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz_Hejnak?= Subject: Re: SSH Brute force attacks Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 07:19:33 +0200 Message-ID: <42897EE5.90703@wp.pl> References: <427B93EE.3030905@eccotours.dyndns.org> <427C4EA3.5090501@riverviewtech.net> <4281FC1A.8090000@eccotours.dyndns.org> <42824D1E.7040508@riverviewtech.net> <4285C016.2060900@wp.pl> <42864CA9.7050802@riverviewtech.net> <428856F8.60706@wp.pl> <42897A5E.7010401@wp.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <42897A5E.7010401@wp.pl> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org =A3ukasz Hejnak wrote: > Charlie Brady wrote: > Stick with one "-m recent". > try this: > iptables -A SSH_Brute_Force -m recent --name SSH ! --update --seconds 60 > --hitcount 4 -j RETURN ok, now I got it.. I mindlessly copied the set Taylor Grant sent to the=20 list, and didn't think enough about it. Now I found the missing piece,=20 the packets going in wheren't marked with --name SSH, so here's why the=20 above didn't work, now it works :] Thanks for the help and the patience :) --=20 with regards =A3ukasz Hejnak