All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henrik Holst <henrik_holst@home.se>
To: Jay Strauss <me@heyjay.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid 1 install revealed poor HD performance (I think)
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 01:42:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <428A814D.3000803@home.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <428A09A3.9000802@heyjay.com>

You might also want to try and force UltraDMA mode5 (or the highest 
UltraDMA mode supported by your hardware) with "hdparm -X69 /dev/hda" 
combined with the "Multiple sector mode" (set with "hdparm -m 16 
/dev/hda") that was suggested earlier.

/ Henrik Holst

Jay Strauss wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just installed a simple raid-1.  I have a single HD on each 
> controller.  ie. 2 controllers 2 HDs. That's it, no CD players or DVD 
> drives...
> 
> I did a fresh install of Sarge.  After reboot I unplugged the CD drive, 
> and let the array sync overnight.  It took 10hrs to sync 160GiB, which 
> seemed pretty long, so I executed the "dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null 
> bs=64k count=10000" command I've seen posted on this list.
> 
> It took about a minute and change to complete, which is long.  So out of 
> curiosity I plugged in a CD player and booted Knoppix.  When I ran the 
> same command it took only 30 seconds (which is still not as quick as 
> some of the numbers on this list, but it's an old celeron 466MHz).
> 
> I'm very unfamiliar with options for speeding up hard drive access. What 
> might Knoppix be setting (and how would I look for it), that it's 
> getting 100% better drive performance than a plain jane Sarge install?
> 
> Thanks
> Jay
> 
> ******** Knoppix Run ***********
> 
> root@ttyp0[~]# for i in 1 2 3; do
>  > time dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=64k count=10000
>  > done
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 46.301872 seconds (14154071 bytes/sec)
> 
> real    0m46.754s
> user    0m0.480s
> sys     0m29.710s
> 
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 49.852186 seconds (13146063 bytes/sec)
> 
> real    0m51.075s
> user    0m0.430s
> sys     0m26.610s
> 
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 46.237684 seconds (14173720 bytes/sec)
> 
> real    0m47.928s
> user    0m0.480s
> sys     0m31.770s
> 
> ************** Sarge Run *************
> 
> sandy:~# for i in 1 2 3; do
>  > time dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=64k count=10000
>  > done
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 66.004525 seconds (9929016 bytes/sec)
> 
> real    1m6.052s
> user    0m0.637s
> sys     1m2.888s
> 
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 63.797226 seconds (10272547 bytes/sec)
> 
> real    1m3.886s
> user    0m0.678s
> sys     1m0.732s
> 
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 64.729628 seconds (10124575 bytes/sec)
> 
> real    1m4.822s
> user    0m0.616s
> sys     1m1.668s
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-17 23:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-17 15:11 Raid 1 install revealed poor HD performance (I think) Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 15:50 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-05-17 16:17   ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 16:23     ` Gordon Henderson
2005-05-17 16:52       ` Mike Hardy
2005-05-17 20:51         ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 20:54           ` Mike Hardy
2005-05-17 22:16             ` Tobias Hofmann
2005-05-17 23:00               ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-18  3:28               ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 22:45           ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-05-17 23:42 ` Henrik Holst [this message]
2005-05-18  3:30   ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 23:44 ` Henrik Holst
2005-05-19 15:32   ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-19 16:14     ` Mike Hardy
2005-05-19 18:40       ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-19 20:43         ` Mike Hardy
2005-05-20  1:43           ` Jay Strauss
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0505180206580.1777-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2005-05-18 15:08 ` Mike Hardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=428A814D.3000803@home.se \
    --to=henrik_holst@home.se \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@heyjay.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.