From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nebojsa Trpkovic Subject: [Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)] Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 01:25:27 +0200 Message-ID: <428BCEE7.2040008@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020201020105000507070001" Return-path: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020201020105000507070001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Unfortunately... --------------020201020105000507070001 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Delivery Status Notification (Failure)" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Delivery Status Notification (Failure)" X-Account-Key: account2 X-Gmail-Received: 1f384bd41b2a0d11fbb8c9b67427c0e4379e948b Delivered-To: trxman@gmail.com Received: by 10.38.76.78 with SMTP id y78cs13962rna; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.55.10 with SMTP id d10mr253768nza; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <> Received: from CH-website (ip-210-97-67-210.rev.dyxnet.com [210.67.97.210]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 8si922906nzn.2005.05.18.11.55.24; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 210.67.97.210 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ) From: postmaster@CH-website To: trxman@gmail.com Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 02:59:14 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C55703CFECBB660000001BCH?website" Message-ID: Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) This is a MIME-formatted message. Portions of this message may be unreadable without a MIME-capable mail program. --9B095B5ADSN=_01C55703CFECBB660000001BCH?website Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, due to being unable to connect successfully to the destination mail server. support@chaintech.de --9B095B5ADSN=_01C55703CFECBB660000001BCH?website Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns;CH-website Received-From-MTA: dns;CH-website Arrival-Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 01:11:18 +0800 Final-Recipient: rfc822;support@chaintech.de Action: failed Status: 4.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;451 Temporary local problem - please try later --9B095B5ADSN=_01C55703CFECBB660000001BCH?website Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from mail pickup service by CH-website with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 17 May 2005 01:11:18 +0800 From: To: Subject: New Required from Chaintech Web Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 01:11:18 +0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2005 17:11:18.0953 (UTC) FILETIME=[46A1A990:01C55A3A] Frist Name : Nebojsa Last Name : Trpkovic Mail Date : 2005/5/17 Mail Address : trxman@gmail.com Select Country : Germany Telephone No : FAX No : Main Board Model : VNF3-250 VGA Type : Xelo Ti4200 8x Product Serial Number : 0412035507 Distributor / Retailer : http://www.dualc.co.yu/ Problem Description : So, I have this issue and as I can see there are more people out there that have the same issue.
On my board C'n'Q works fine if there is one RAM module. If there is two modules (no matter dimm 1 & 2 or 1 & 3 are populated) C'n'Q locks machine and I have to do hard reset.

Memory modules are 2 x Kingmax Color RAM 466MHz CAS 3.0 256MB single sidded modules, running at 400MHz with timmings "BY SPD". In that situation, command rate is 2T but it does not help.
It happens both in Windows and in Linux (Gentoo Linux with 2.6.11 kernel).

C'n'Q works just as it should work if I put just one memory module, both in Windows and in Linux.

All that is not so big problem to me because there's no way to dinamicly slow down fans on the board, so any dinamic changing of frequency looses its' significance.
I wrote this to you because AMD represent on cpufreq list told me so.

Regards,
Nebojsa Trpkovic

P.S. I'm from Serbia & Montenegro and there's no way to select my country.




If this problem also occurs on Windows, please report
it to your motherboard manufacturer immediately. They'll
get it fixed.

-Mark Langsdorf
AMD, Inc.


>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk
>> [mailto:cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk] On Behalf Of
>> Nebojsa Trpkovic
>> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 6:50 PM
>> To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
>> Subject: Re: cpu-freq causing kernel lock-up after upgrading
>> to 1GB ram.
>>
>>
>> Same problem here - VNF3-250 - if there's one RAM module
>> C'n'Q works fine, and if I put two modules it freezes every
>> time I try to change frequency, no matter linux or windows.
>> So, it's not cpufreq related problem - it just buggy VNF3-250
>> C'n'Q inplementation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> chris stones wrote:
>>
>
>>> > This is my first attempt at a bug report, so forgive me for
>
>> making a
>
>>> > mess, I will try my best.
>>> >
>>> > -------------------------
>>> > hardware:
>>> > -------------------------
>>> > mobo: Chaintech VNF3-250
>>> > chipset: nForce-3
>>> > CPU: amd64 Athlon 3400+
>>> > Ram: 2 * Kingston 512Meg DDR400 PC3200 2T timeing 3-3-8-3.
>
>> (total 1GB)
>
>>> > Swap : 1.3 Gb.
>>> >
>>> > --------------------------
>>> > software:
>>> > --------------------------
>>> > Distro: Gentoo 2005.0 (comiped as 64bit with multilib)
>>> > GCC: gcc version 3.4.3 20041125 (Gentoo Linux 3.4.3-r1, ssp-3.4.3-0,
>>> > pie-8.7.7)
>>> > kernel versions: gentoo 2.6.11-r7; vanilla-2.6.10; vanilla-2.6.11.9
>>> >
>>> > --------------------------
>>> > description:
>>> > --------------------------
>>> > I have been using the modules freq_table, cpufreq_ondemand,
>>> > powernow_k8 to regulate my cpu clock for over 6 months with the
>>> > hardware configureation shown above, minus one 512meg ram module.
>>> >
>>> > Recently, i shutdown the box, and added the second memory
>
>> module. At
>
>>> > the time, the cpu_fre drivers were compiled into the
>
>> kernel, shortly
>
>>> > after booting, the system would freese when cpu_freq
>
>> lowered my cpu to
>
>>> > its idle state of 1Ghz.
>>> >
>>> > These conditions must all be met to cause the lock-up.
>>> > 1) Both Ram moodules are used (1GB ram)
>>> > 2) the modules freq_table, cpufreq_ondemand, powernow_k8 are loaded.
>>> > 3) The lockup occurs when the cpu is slowing down from a period of
>>> > heavy load.
>>> >
>>> > 2 hours running memtest86 shows that my memory is not the problem.
>>> >
>>> > one one occasion, the kernel gave a memory dump before the
>
>> freeze. i
>
>>> > regret i didnt take note of its rull contents, but a function trace
>>> > line mentioned a cpu_freq function call.
>>> >
>>> > If i remove one of the 512meg memory modules, the cpu_freq
>>> > performsperfectly, as it has for the past 6 months.
>>> >
>>> > Thankyou for taking the time to read my post.
>>> > Is there anything i can do (other than go without ram or
>
>> cpu_freq) to
>
>>> > solve this ? is there any more information you require from me ?
>>> >
>>> > I have googled, but found no other similar bug reports.
>>> >
>>> > From Chris.stones@gmail.com.
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Cpufreq mailing list
>>> > Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
>>> > http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq
>>> >
>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cpufreq mailing list
>> Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
>> http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpu> freq
>>
>>
BIOS Date : 2004/10/19 CD Version : Operating System : both Windows and Linux 2.6.11 CPU Type : AMD Athlon64 3000+ (Newcastle core) Memory Modules : 2 x 256MB Kingmax Color RAM 466MHz CAS 3.0 Other Devices : --9B095B5ADSN=_01C55703CFECBB660000001BCH?website-- --------------020201020105000507070001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cpufreq mailing list Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq --------------020201020105000507070001--