From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nivedita Singhvi Subject: Re: [PATCH] Xenoprof patches for xen-unstable Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 12:22:58 -0700 Message-ID: <4294D092.9030207@us.ibm.com> References: <6C21311CEE34E049B74CC0EF339464B924B3A0@cacexc12.americas.cpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6C21311CEE34E049B74CC0EF339464B924B3A0@cacexc12.americas.cpqcorp.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Santos, Jose Renato G" Cc: Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Santos, Jose Renato G wrote: > hi, > > I have attached patches for enabling system wide profiling > using oprofile for xen unstable. > The patches were generated against change-set 1.1507 (May 22). > The 4 attached files are Jose, thanks very much for this! I really needed it... > 1) xenoprof.txt: > - xenoprof overview and user guide > 2) xenoprof-1.1-xen-3.0-devel.patch: > - patch for xen > 3) xenoprof-1.1-linux-2.6.11: > - patch for linux. Note that this needs to be applied > twice, once to linux-2.6.11-xen0 and once to > linux-2.6.11-xenU. (This is different than the last > patch which was created against the linux sparse tree). > 4) xenoprof-1.1-oprofile-0.8.2: > - patch for oprofile version 0.8.2 > > Current known limitation/bugs are > - No support for SMP guests yet. > - when using passive domains, most samples are lost. Excuse my ignorance - what exactly is a passive domain? > I will be working on these issues and post new patches > when I have them available. thanks! Nivedita