From: marco <marco@accessplus.com.au>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: online fsck
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 16:15:15 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4296BAF3.1030803@accessplus.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <263a8b35050524200220eff78b@mail.gmail.com>
btinsley wrote:
>What i'm looking for is a check on a reiserfs filesystem that is
>mounted read-write. Many modern filesystems, especially those on NAS
>devices, can run periodic background consistency checks on filesystems
>with almost zero impact on performance. Some devices are reportedly
>running these checks constantly, possibly correcting errors without
>user intervention... even a notification to a sysadmin would be a good
>feature.
>
>
>
I, too, am looking for a solution to be able to do some sort of check
_regardless_ of whether and how
the filesystem is mounted.....
>On 5/24/05, marco <marco@accessplus.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Running 'fsck.reiserfs --check -y </dev/part>' will do the trick. The
>>equivalent for ext3 and other filesystems is
>>'fsck -n </dev/part>', the ext3 version detects that it is mounted rw,
>>and does a readonly check.
>>
>>What I wonder is if we can get fsck.reiser[fs,4] to honour option
>>processing in a manner more consistant with
>>the other fscks, so that adding reiserfs to a list of user choosable
>>filesystems is not going to cause a nightmare
>>of an overhead of filesystem detection, command option re-mapping and
>>other related headaches.....
>>
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-27 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-23 18:24 online fsck btinsley
2005-05-24 10:43 ` E.Gryaznova
2005-05-24 23:26 ` marco
2005-05-25 3:02 ` btinsley
2005-05-27 6:15 ` marco [this message]
2005-05-27 9:17 ` Philippe Gramoullé
2005-05-27 9:32 ` Yiannis Mavroukakis
2005-05-27 14:12 ` mjt
2005-05-27 22:50 ` David Masover
2005-05-27 23:04 ` btinsley
2005-05-28 7:58 ` Vladimir Saveliev
[not found] <20040422150042.5b49c6c3.pegasus@nerv.eu.org>
2004-04-22 13:34 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-22 14:24 ` Jure Pečar
2004-04-22 15:24 ` Chris Dukes
2004-04-22 15:45 ` Nikita Danilov
2004-04-22 15:58 ` Marcelo Pacheco
2004-04-22 17:11 ` Chris Dukes
2004-04-22 17:51 ` Hans Reiser
2004-04-22 18:06 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-22 18:14 ` Hans Reiser
2004-04-22 18:15 ` Chris Dukes
2004-04-25 14:10 ` daniel.poelzleithner
2004-04-22 23:20 ` Matthias Andree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4296BAF3.1030803@accessplus.com.au \
--to=marco@accessplus.com.au \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.