From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yiannis Mavroukakis Subject: Re: online fsck Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 10:32:14 +0100 Message-ID: <4296E91E.5050505@darthvader.us> References: <263a8b350505231124758be936@mail.gmail.com> <42930542.1000407@namesys.com> <4293B817.5030906@accessplus.com.au> <263a8b35050524200220eff78b@mail.gmail.com> <20050527091725.E7CC5BF6@philou.gramoulle.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20050527091725.E7CC5BF6@philou.gramoulle.local> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Philippe Gramoull=E9 wrote: >Hello, > >On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:02:20 -0500 >btinsley wrote: > > | What i'm looking for is a check on a reiserfs filesystem that is > | mounted read-write. Many modern filesystems, especially those on NAS > | devices, can run periodic background consistency checks on filesystems > | with almost zero impact on performance. Some devices are reportedly > | running these checks constantly, possibly correcting errors without > | user intervention... even a notification to a sysadmin would be a good > | feature. > >Last time i asked Hans about the possibility to have a --rebuild-tree (for= reiserfs) while the fs is online and mounted rw, >he told me to send 30.000 US Dollars in, and that it could eventually be d= one ;) > >Sure lots of people would find this a killer feature, but someone will def= initely have to pay get such a feature implemented. > >Thanks, > >Philippe > =20 > Then Hans should setup a paypal account for donations. I'd gladly give=20 what I can spare, and I think so would a lot of people here. ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email=20 ______________________________________________________________________