From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Taylor, Grant" Subject: Re: routing within same nic card Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 01:59:52 -0500 Message-ID: <429C0B68.8090101@riverviewtech.net> References: <000a01c565a0$867deee0$d40aa8c0@winxp> <429BFAE6.90200@riverviewtech.net><00ca01c565a7$759eeaa0$d40aa8c0@winxp> <429C04B1.60208@riverviewtech.net> <00e801c565ad$29c91a00$d40aa8c0@winxp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <00e801c565ad$29c91a00$d40aa8c0@winxp> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Beyond a little bit of house keeping of duplicate rules and more open allows (destination or source only matches) I think what you have would work. I do not see any thing that would keep your traffic from flowing like you want though you might find some traffic flow that you do not want. Grant. . . .