From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: File as a directory - Ordered Relations Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 10:07:04 -0700 Message-ID: <429C99B8.7040400@namesys.com> References: <6708893568-BeMail@cr593174-a> <4297FA03.6050603@slaphack.com> <200505281942.j4SJgbpi009886@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <429ACC7E.4040101@namesys.com> <1117557975.13252.12.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <1117557975.13252.12.camel@localhost> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Jonathan Briggs Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, David Masover , "Alexander G. M. Smith" , Leo Comerford , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Jonathan Briggs wrote: > >Why innovate in the filesystem though, when it would work just as well >or better in the VFS layer? > Why don't we just have one filesystem, think of the advantages..... ;-) I don't try to get other people to follow my lead anymore, I just ship code that works. Putting it into VFS requires getting others to follow my lead. Ain't gonna happen. Getting them to leave me alone to innovate in my corner of the kernel? Might happen if I fight for it, but it will be a real struggle. Hans