From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:48:10 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] filter ingress policy based on nfmark
Message-Id: <429ED5DA.90109@dsl.pipex.com>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <200506011156.13278.mv-lists@net-surf.net>
In-Reply-To: <200506011156.13278.mv-lists@net-surf.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

Martin Vassilev wrote:
> On Thursday 02 June 2005 00:31, you wrote:
> 
> 
>>On 2.6 whether policer sees marks or not depends on your kernel config.
>>
>>If you don't select classifier actions then you get the 2.4 behavior.
>>
>>Andy.
> 
> 
> Many thanks.
> 

Oops it's called packet action in the menu not classifier actions its 
CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT which when deselected should allow you to select 
traffic policing rather than policing actions.

Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc