Re: 2.6.12-rc5-mm2: "bic unavailable using TCP reno" messages

[Baruch Even <baruch@ev-en.org>]

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Here is what I am working on as better way to make the sysctl selection.
> I am not totally happy with the way the default congestion control value is determined
> by the load order. But it does seem good that if you load "tcp_xxx" module and it
> registers it becomes the default.

Looks good.

> @@ -120,6 +117,52 @@ static int ipv4_sysctl_forward_strategy(
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> +static int proc_tcp_congestion_control(ctl_table *ctl, int write, struct file * filp,
> +				       void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> +	char val[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX];
> +	ctl_table tbl = {
> +		.data = val,
> +		.maxlen = TCP_CA_NAME_MAX,
> +	};
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	tcp_get_congestion_control(val);

Maybe we should call this tcp_get_current_congestion_control(), the
current name implies (to me) that you give it a name and it returns the
the ca struct. get_current might also just return the current one and
the strcpy can be done here.

Otherwise you probably should document the tcp_get_congestion_control()
to say what size of string it accepts.

Baruch