From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gypsy Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 18:05:04 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] 2-3 uplinks, nat and failover...is it possible? Message-Id: <42A33ED0.7DF30186@iswest.com> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org aristo7514 aristo7514 wrote: > I have a public IP block > 81.8.124.1-81.8.124.63 and 172.17.whatever as well as 172.18.whatever and 81.8.120 :( ... Why do you confuse us with just the one? > Here is the list for my ip addresses. > > eth0 has ip 172.16.55.1/255.255.255.0 > eth0:1 has ip 172.17.56.1/255.255.255.0 > eth0:2 has ip 172.17.57.1/255.255.255.0 > eth0:3 has ip 172.17.58.1/255.255.255.0 > eth0:4 has ip 81.8.124.1/255.255.255.192 I doubt that eth0:# is ever going to work because others have reported failure to this ML under similar circumstances. > eth1 has ip 81.8.120.18/255.255.255.252 > eth3 has ip 172.18.10.30/255.255.255.0 > > One of my internet connection is 81.8.120.18/255.255.255.252 with > gateway of 81.8.120.17 (Public) > > The other one is 172.18.10.30/255.255.255.0 with gateway of > 172.18.10.2 (Behind an ADSL router) Have you read Martin Brown's stuff at http://linux-ip.net/ ? If not, you've missed (what I consider to be) the most understandable documentation on the internet. With Julian's patch, nano.txt and a reading of Martin you should be able to use all the internet connections. Dead Gateway Detection may not work depending on the number of hops to the dead gateway. -- gypsy _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc