From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacob Gorm Hansen Subject: Re: Microsoft plans 'hypervisor' for Longhorn Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 18:23:11 -0700 Message-ID: <42A6487F.1030903@diku.dk> References: <000b01c56bc5$b6a1bef0$0201a8c0@hawk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org M.A. Williamson wrote: >> Article mentions Xen as Microsoft's competition. > > > The MS hypervisor is a very interesting beast from our PoV: * drivers > run in a dom0-like "parent" partition (cut down Longhorn) * "child" > partitions devices are plumbed through this * VMM-aware OSes can use > APIs called "enlightenments" (don't you usually achieve enlightenment > through practising Zen? :-D) to avoid full-virt penalties > > Their roadmap includes live migration and suspend-resume, USB > virtualisation, etc. I like live migration :-) . Do you have a link to this roadmap? Jacob