From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261335AbVFIOWV (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:22:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261539AbVFIOWV (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:22:21 -0400 Received: from smtpout03-04.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.74]:16771 "HELO smtpout03-04.mesa1.secureserver.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261335AbVFIOWT (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:22:19 -0400 Message-ID: <42A85065.4000108@coyotegulch.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 10:21:25 -0400 From: Scott Robert Ladd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050512) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Has anyone had problems with GCC 4.0 and the kernel? X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, I've had several inquiries recently in regard to compiling the kernel with GCC 4.0. It seems folk are having problems, do a Google search, and find my capsule review of GCC 4.0 at: http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/gcc4/index.html I'm not running a GCC 4.0-created kernel, but I had no problems compiling it and running one a few weeks ago. Before I start looking into this further, has anyone here had problems with GCC 4? Maybe I just hallucinated that it compiled and booted... ;) ..Scott