* [PATCH NF_CONNTRACK 8/9]: zero-clear union area in tuple for expectant
@ 2005-05-23 6:23 Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
2005-06-11 15:36 ` Patrick McHardy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI @ 2005-05-23 6:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kaber; +Cc: netfilter-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 253 bytes --]
This patch clears union area in tuple for expectant.
Signed-off-by: Yasuyuki Kozakai <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Yasuyuki Kozakai @ USAGI Project <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp>
[-- Attachment #2: 08-expect.patch --]
[-- Type: Text/Plain, Size: 556 bytes --]
diff -Nur linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-7-nat-seq/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-8-expect/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
--- linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-7-nat-seq/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 2005-05-20 03:18:29.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-8-expect/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 2005-05-20 03:16:23.000000000 +0900
@@ -987,6 +987,8 @@
DEBUGP("expect_related: OOM allocating expect\n");
return NULL;
}
+ NF_CT_TUPLE_U_BLANK(&new->tuple);
+ NF_CT_TUPLE_U_BLANK(&new->mask);
new->master = NULL;
return new;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH NF_CONNTRACK 8/9]: zero-clear union area in tuple for expectant
2005-05-23 6:23 [PATCH NF_CONNTRACK 8/9]: zero-clear union area in tuple for expectant Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
@ 2005-06-11 15:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-15 4:05 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2005-06-11 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI; +Cc: netfilter-devel
Yasuyuki KOZAKAI wrote:
> This patch clears union area in tuple for expectant.
Why is this necessary? The helpers should initialize tuple and mask.
Regards
Patrick
> diff -Nur linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-7-nat-seq/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-8-expect/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> --- linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-7-nat-seq/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 2005-05-20 03:18:29.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.12-rc4-nfct-8-expect/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c 2005-05-20 03:16:23.000000000 +0900
> @@ -987,6 +987,8 @@
> DEBUGP("expect_related: OOM allocating expect\n");
> return NULL;
> }
> + NF_CT_TUPLE_U_BLANK(&new->tuple);
> + NF_CT_TUPLE_U_BLANK(&new->mask);
> new->master = NULL;
> return new;
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH NF_CONNTRACK 8/9]: zero-clear union area in tuple for expectant
2005-06-11 15:36 ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2005-06-15 4:05 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI @ 2005-06-15 4:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kaber; +Cc: netfilter-devel, yasuyuki.kozakai
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 425 bytes --]
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:36:44 +0200
> Yasuyuki KOZAKAI wrote:
> > This patch clears union area in tuple for expectant.
>
> Why is this necessary? The helpers should initialize tuple and mask.
OK, please apply this patch instead of it.
Regards,
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Yasuyuki Kozakai @ USAGI Project <yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp>
[-- Attachment #2: exp-tuple-init.patch --]
[-- Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1564 bytes --]
Index: net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ftp.c
===================================================================
--- 9f4386a4dd0fa00c434d7acc6b8bc3de43e60a3b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ftp.c (mode:100644)
+++ uncommitted/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ftp.c (mode:100644)
@@ -565,28 +565,29 @@
sizeof(exp->tuple.dst.u3));
}
+ exp->tuple.src.u3 = ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u3;
+ exp->tuple.src.l3num = cmd.l3num;
+ exp->tuple.src.u.tcp.port = 0;
+ exp->tuple.dst.u.tcp.port = cmd.u.tcp.port;
+ exp->tuple.dst.protonum = IPPROTO_TCP;
+
+ exp->mask = (struct nf_conntrack_tuple)
+ { .src = { .l3num = 0xFFFF,
+ .u = { .tcp = { 0 }},
+ },
+ .dst = { .protonum = 0xFF,
+ .u = { .tcp = { 0xFFFF }},
+ },
+ };
if (cmd.l3num == PF_INET) {
- exp->tuple.src.u3.ip = ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u3.ip;
exp->mask.src.u3.ip = 0xFFFFFFFF;
exp->mask.dst.u3.ip = 0xFFFFFFFF;
} else {
- memcpy(exp->tuple.src.u3.ip6,
- ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u3.ip6,
- sizeof(exp->tuple.src.u3.ip6));
memset(exp->mask.src.u3.ip6, 0xFF,
sizeof(exp->mask.src.u3.ip6));
memset(exp->mask.dst.u3.ip6, 0xFF,
sizeof(exp->mask.src.u3.ip6));
}
- exp->tuple.src.l3num = cmd.l3num;
- exp->tuple.src.u.tcp.port = 0;
- exp->tuple.dst.u.tcp.port = cmd.u.tcp.port;
- exp->tuple.dst.protonum = IPPROTO_TCP;
-
- exp->mask.src.l3num = 0xFFFF;
- exp->mask.src.u.tcp.port = 0;
- exp->mask.dst.u.tcp.port = 0xFFFF;
- exp->mask.dst.protonum = 0xFF;
exp->expectfn = NULL;
exp->master = ct;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-15 4:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-23 6:23 [PATCH NF_CONNTRACK 8/9]: zero-clear union area in tuple for expectant Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
2005-06-11 15:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-15 4:05 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.